How Hot is Hot?

Sorry, photograph of the core-mantle boundary is temporarily unavailable.

Sorry, photograph of the core-mantle boundary is temporarily unavailable.

How Hot is Hot?  4,000 degrees K, according to new study.  Researchers at the Magma and Volcanoes Laboratory (CNRS U Blaise Pascal) and the European Synchrotron (ESRF) have collided to make sense of the really hot temperatures at the core-mantle boundary. The CNRS-ESRF study, “New Insight into the Temp- erature of Deep Earth,” has mimicked the conditions at 2,900 kilometres below surface. Plate tectonics theory tells us that our ocean crust is subducted towards that mantle-core interface. CNRS-ESRF tells us that at the boundary temperatures rise rapidly to 4,000 K and the basaltic former crust produces a silica-rich liquid that reacts with the surrounding mantle material. As one approaches the lower mantle (hopefully in an insulated jump suit), one finds that the temperature gradient increases more rapidly than it does at shallower mantle depths. The scientists tell us that the temperature increases about 1,000 in the last few hundred kilometres.

The point of the study was to observe what happens to basalt as it approaches lower-mantle conditions. This was achieved in the lab. Discovering the traits of the basalt seems to have shed some light on mysteries surrounding seismic wave propagation in the D” (D” being geo-speak for the mantle-core region). By recreating a pressure of 46 GPa (That’s right, 46-gazillion pascals of pressure!) the team found that they had created a basaltic slurry that could be giving the seismic anomalies others have observed. They realized that the temperature would have to be between 3800 and 4150 K  for this to occur, hence their prediction that this is the D” zone’s temperature. You can read the paper by Denis Andrault in the journal Science by following this link.

It is interesting that we are still working out the temperatures down there. In The Mountain Mystery, I told part of the story of Joseph Fourier and his thought-experiment that placed a piece of the Sun 12 miles below our surface. He said it would take 200,000 years before the dissipating heat reached the surface through conduction. Fourier pre-dated Lord Kelvin with heat-transfer calculations and his math was better, but Kelvin was a powerful force and his errors about the Earth’s temperature, heat dissipation, and the planet’s age are what we remember today. Kelvin thought the Earth’s internal heat was largely residual and the Sun’s heat was due to gravitational pressure. (When radiation and X-rays were discovered, the elderly Kelvin declared them to be hoaxes.)  Consequently, he opted for a young-aged Earth of some 20 million years. He also soundly rejected the idea of mantle convection when it was presented to him by his colleague and assistant, John Perry in 1898. Perry published his idea in Nature and Kelvin ruined his career for his insubordination. And yet, we calculate the core-mantle boundary temperature as 4,000 K. Four thousand Lord Kelvins – now that’s a disturbing mental image!

Read the book,  The Mountain Mystery.

About Ron Miksha

Ron Miksha is a geophysicist who also does a bit of science writing and blogging. Ron has worked as a radio broadcaster, a beekeeper, and is based in Calgary, Alberta, Canada. He has written two books, dozens of magazine and journal articles, and complements his first book, Bad Beekeeping, with a popular blog at Ron wrote his most recent book, The Mountain Mystery, for everyone who has looked at a mountain and wondered what miracles of nature set it upon the landscape. For more about Ron, including some cool pictures taken when he was a teenager, please check Ron's site:
This entry was posted in History, How Geophysics Works, The Book and tagged , , , , . Bookmark the permalink.

2 Responses to How Hot is Hot?

  1. not degrees k just k 0 is absolute


    • Ron Miksha says:

      Thank you, you are correct. Our lead “How Hot is Hot? 4,000 degrees K, according to new study…” should have read “4,000 K” – elsewhere in the story we seem to have used the proper terminology. Appreciate your comment. I’ll leave the intro as it is and see if it draws any more sharp eyes.


Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s